Chartaprops 16 pty ltd & another v silberman
WebMar 27, 2024 · Property data for 16 Labrina Avenue, Prospect, SA 5082. Get sold price history for this house & median property prices for Prospect, SA 5082 Chartaprops 16 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Silberman is an important case in the South African law of agency. It was heard in the Supreme Court of Appeal by Scott JA, Nugent JA, Ponnan JA, Maya JA and Leach AJA on May 14, 2008. They delivered judgment on September 25. The case was an appeal from a decision in the Witwatersrand Local Division by Boruchowitz J.
Chartaprops 16 pty ltd & another v silberman
Did you know?
WebNov 17, 2016 · Chartaprops 16 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Silberman – LindsayKeller Attorneys. 2009 (1) SA 265 (SCA) On behalf of the appellant. Setting out the liability, if any, of principals for the negligent acts of independent contractors. 17 November 2016. WebSep 25, 2008 · Chartaprops 16 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Silberman is an important case in the South African law of agency. It was heard in the Supreme Court Of Appeal by Scott JA, Nugent JA, Ponnan JA, Maya JA and Leach AJA on May 14, 2008. They delivered judgment on September 25. The case was an appeal from a decision in the Witwatersrand Local …
WebNugent JA, in Chartaprops 16 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Silberman, [4] thought it “clear from the following passage that the majority [in Langley Fox] considered that duty to … http://www.lawlibrary.co.za/professionalupdate/2009/07_02/recentjournalarticles_clisb.htm
WebChartaprops 16 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Silberman[1][2]is an important case in the South African law of agency. It was heard in the Supreme Court of Appeal by Scott JA, Nugent … WebMar 9, 2015 · This view was held by the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in the case of Chartaprops 16 (Pty) Ltd and another v Silberman 2009 (1) SA 265 (SCA). The SCA explained that the correct approach to the liability of a principal (employer) for the negligence or wrongdoing of an independent contractor is to apply the fundamental rule that obliges …
WebFeb 28, 2024 · The court referred to and approved the majority decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal in Chartaprops 16 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Silberman. Both courts …
WebApr 24, 2024 · The case of Chartaprops (Pty) Ltd & another v Silberman, highly important, illustrates this principle. Mrs Silberman was injured in casu when she slipped and fell in a shopping mall owned by Chartaprops, which had appointed a company, Advanced Planning, to do the cleaning of the mall. fencing panels with gapshttp://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/2010/26.pdf fencing panels warringtonWebJan 21, 2024 · Furthermore, in the case of Chartaprops 16 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Silberman [2009] (1) SA 265 (SCA), the Supreme Court of Appeal held and confirmed that a mall owner could conceivably be held liable for the wrongs committed by an independent contractor if the owner failed to take reasonable steps to prevent the risk of harm. In this … fencing part of yardWebThis view was held by the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in the case of Chartaprops 16 (Pty) Ltd and another v Silberman 2009 (1) SA 265 (SCA). The SCA explained that the correct approach to the liability of a principal (employer) for the negligence or wrongdoing of an independent contractor is to apply the fundamental rule that obliges everyone ... fencing partnersdegrees in wildlife conservationWebSep 25, 2008 · ‘Today the majority of the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) upheld an appeal by Chartaprops 16 (Pty) Ltd (Chartaprops) which carries on business as the Killarney … degrees like computer scienceWebChartaprops 16 (Pty) Limited and Another v Silberman 2001 (1) SA 265 (SCA): A matter which dealt with the liability of a principal for wrongs committed by an independent subcontractor or its employees; Ndlovu v Santam 2006 (2) SA 239 (SCA): A matter which dealt with the repudiation of contracts and the appealability of decisions fencing panels northern ireland