WebPOM Wonderful, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, 777 F.3d 478 (2015). Background and Facts POM Wonderful, LLC, makes and sells pomegranate-based products. In ads, POM touted medical studies claiming to show that daily consumption of its products could treat, prevent, or reduce the … WebMay 2, 2014 · POM Wonderful, LLC v. FTC. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. May 2, 2014, Argued; January 30, 2015, Decided. No. 13-1060. Opinion [**116] [*483] Srinivasan [***2] , Circuit Judge: POM Wonderful, LLC produces, markets, and sells a number of pomegranate-based products. In a series of advertisements from …
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia …
WebMay 2, 2016 · On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the court ruling that upheld the FTC decision, which found POM and its owners had misled consumers in … WebMar 25, 2016 · The Coca-Cola Company, Case No. 2:08-cv-06237 (C.D. Cal.) rejected POM Wonderful’s allegations that the labeling for The Coca-Cola Co.’s pomegranate-blueberry juice blend (which complied with ... oregon state football depth chart 2022
The Verdict: POM Wonderful Misled Its Customers, A Blow To
WebJun 14, 2016 · The Supreme Court has denied POM Wonderful, LLC’s petition for a writ of certiorari in its ongoing dispute with the FTC. POM sought to challenge the D.C. Circuit’s … WebPOM WONDERFUL, LLC v. F.T.C. 479 . Cite as 777 F.3d 478 (D.C. Cir. 2015) 2. Antitrust and Trade Regulation . O. 163 . When determining whether an adver-tisement is deceptive in violation of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act, the ... POM Wonderful Appeal v. Federal Trade Commission WebMay 2, 2014 · The case against the FTC at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is POM Wonderful v the Federal Trade Commission and is case No. 13-1060. Reporting by Diane Bartz; Editing by David Gregorio oregon state football clothing