Web12 apr. 2024 · 57. judgment of the Patna High Court Jan Chaukidar v Union of India(2004) — upheld by the Supreme Court • All those in lawful police or judicial custody, other than those held in preventive detention, will forfeit their right to stand for election. • Since Section 62(5) of the Act prevents those in lawful custody from voting, the ... WebUnion of India – Jan Chaukidar v. Union of India – Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India – Lok Prahari v. Union of India. In which of the following case, the Supreme Court held that the public authority providing services or goods as per the definition under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 must be held liable to pay ...
Representation of People Act – Recent Verdicts Simplified
WebIn the case of S. Radha Krishnan v.Union of India, when again the Supreme Court had an occasion to reflect on Section 62, and Sub-clause (5), in this case it observed that "any … WebJan Chaukidar (Peoples Watch ... Through Its Convenor Basant Kumar chaudhary Versus Union Of India Criminal Writ Jurisdiction No. 4880 of 2004 ; 4988 of ... Constitution of … how much is don julio in south africa
EXPANSION OF RULE OF LAW AND JUDICIARY: THE INDIAN …
Web27 mar. 2016 · Lily Thomas vs. Union of India 2004 Case. The Representation of Peoples Act provides that- if a person is convicted under a punishable offence related to so and … Web27 aug. 2024 · This Article is submitted by – Pooja Agarwal, 3 Year LLB at Cmr School of Legal Studies.; In the Supreme Court of India WP (C) No.541/2024 Petitioner A. K. Kraipak & ors. etc. Respondents Union of India & ors. Date of Judgement 29 th April 1969 Bench Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. Hidayatullah, C.J., J.M. Shelat, K.S. Hegde, A.N. Grover and … Web8 aug. 2013 · A similar concern underpins the short but significant decision of the Supreme Court of India in Chief Election Commissioner v Jan Chaukidar (Civil Appeals 3040 … how do cars utilize explosions