WebFeb 14, 2024 · State v. Arreola, 176 Wn.2d 284, 291, 290 P.3d 983 (2012). We review findings of fact related to a motion to suppress under the substantial evidence standard. State v. Montes-Malindas, 144 Wn.App. 254, 259, 182 P.3d 999 (2008), overruled on other grounds by Brendlin v. California, 551 U.S. 249, 127 S.Ct. 2400, 168 L.Ed.2d 132 (2007). WebDec 20, 2012 · Chacon Arreola, 163 Wash.App. 787, 795–96, 260 P.3d 985 (2011), are unchallenged before this court and thus are verities on appeal, State v. Gaines, 154 Wash.2d 711, 716, 116 P.3d 993 (2005). ¶ 4 On October 10, 2009, Officer Tony Valdivia of the Mattawa Police Department responded to a report of a possible DUI (driving under the …
178 Wn. App. 236, STATE V. MCLEAN - MRSC
WebFeb 23, 2013 · WA: While Washington recognizes pretext stops, a mixed motive is not unconstitutional Posted on February 23, 2013 by fourth While Washington recognizes pretext stops, a mixed motive is not unconstitutional. State v. Arreola, 176 Wn.2d 284, 290 P.3d 983 (2012), rev’g State v. Arreola, 163 Wn. App. 787, 260 P.3d 985 (2011): WebSep 15, 2011 · Washington; State v. Arreola, No. 29164–2–III. Document Cited authorities 19 Cited in 5 Precedent Map Related. Vincent. Court: Court of Appeals of Washington: ... see State v. Chacon Arreola, 163 Wash.App. 787, 795–96, 260 P.3d 985 (2011), are unchallenged before this court and thus are verities on appeal, State v. Gaines, 154 … red dress pics
STATE v. ARREOLA (2012) FindLaw
WebIn the present case, an officer admitted his primary reason for stopping a car State v. Arreola (Gilberto Chacon), No. 86610-4 was to conduct a speculative criminal investigation that … WebNov 29, 2011 · The case proceeded to a bench trial and the court found Mr. Arreola guilty of possession of a controlled substance on stipulated facts. DISCUSSION Mr. Arreola … WebSTATE OF WASHINGTON 311812024 8:00 AM BY SUSAN L. CARLSON CLERK COA No. 35704-0-111 No. 96851-9 IN THE SUPREME COURT ... (See State v. Arreola, 176 Wn.2d at 294), and that he disagrees with the evolution of the law under Arreola. The Defendant's disagreement with a relatively recent en bane red dress pencil